Reward Strategy news and training

Age discrimination and the National Living Wage

On 8 June 2016, Westminster Hall heard a debate on Age Discrimination and the National Living Wage.

Ian   Holloway
Twitter LinkedIn
Ian   Holloway
Twitter LinkedIn

On 8 June 2016, Westminster Hall heard a debate on Age Discrimination and the National Living Wage. Two days prior to this, on 6 June, the House of Common Library released a Debate Pack on this issue with the same name. A Debate Pack is, in its simplest form, a gathering of useful information, facts and figures that are relevant to the actual debate itself.

 

The debate and the pack itself reopens the issue of whether the age bands in the current National Minimum Wage legislation can be justified – remembering that the National Living Wage is actually just another banding of the National Minimum Wage.

 

Of course, the pack and the debate itself are admirable in their intentions of asking whether the age bands are discriminatory in terms of pay. A common argument that has always been presented to justify these bands is that paying a younger worker less will encourage employers to take them into the workplace. This argument stretches all the way back to the late 1990s. Whether this has ever actually been achieved seems to depend on which research papers you choose to read. The fact that successive governments have recognised youth unemployment and introduced measures to combat it (no employer’s NICs on under 21s for example) suggests to me that this justification has no merit.

 

The future?

 

I believe that the Debate Pack and the transcript of the debate itself are eminently readable. But what of the future, if anything? The debate was an opportunity for Holly Lynch MP to raise this issue and receive a response from a government minister (Nicholas Boles MP, minister of state, Department for Business Innovation and Skills). At the end of the debate, Ms Lynch received an assurance from Mr Boles that further evidence supporting pay discrimination would be provided to her. Maybe we have not seen the last of this.

 

Employers should be mindful that age discrimination is actually unlawful in employment (except in terms of the rate of the National Minimum/Living Wage payable). This is courtesy of the Equality Act 2010 in Great Britain and the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 in Northern Ireland.

Read More

Age discrimination and the National Living Wage Age discrimination and the National Living Wage
Twitter LinkedIn
Add New Comment

MORE STORIES

Shared parental leave could help close the gender pay gap

The take up of shared parental leave is as low as two percent, of qualifying families, and employees need to be alerted to this option, says HR software provider Activ Absence

Bacs To The Future

If you’re a payroll professional, you’re probably scratching your head wondering why the rest of the world seems to be riding a technological juggernaut when it comes to payments, but in your work life, it’s more like a horse-drawn cart

Upcoming events

Payroll & Reward Conference

The Autumn Update

AVAILABLE TRAINING

General Data Protection - GDPR

Reward Strategy
Reward Strategy RSS

Did you find our website useful?

Thank you for your input

Thank you for your feedback

reward-strategy.com - an online news and information service for the UK’s payroll, reward, pensions, benefits and HR sectors. reward-strategy.com is published by Shard Financial Media Limited, registered in England & Wales as 5481132, Axe & Bottle Court, 70 Newcomen St, London, SE1 1YT. All rights reserved. Reward Strategy is committed to diversity in the workplace.
© Copyright Shard Financial Media Ltd